Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use Jira Cloud for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2187617

Summary: [6.1][rgw-ms] Writing on a bucket with num_shards 0 causes sync issues and rgws to segfault on the replication site.
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Component: RGW-MultisiteAssignee: shilpa <smanjara>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact: Akash Raj <akraj>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, mkasturi, smanjara, tserlin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 6.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.6-24.el9cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Segmentation fault no longer occurs when bucket has a `num_shards` value of `0` Previously, multi-site sync would result in segmentation faults when a bucket had `num_shards` value of `0`. This resulted in inconsistent sync behavior and segmentation fault. With this fix, `num_shards=0` is properly represented in data sync and buckets with shard value `0` does not have any issues with syncing.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-15 09:17:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2192813    

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2023-06-15 09:17:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3623