Bug 2188022
| Summary: | [5.3z2][rgw-ms]:Writing on a bucket with num_shards 0 causes sync issues and rgws to segfault on the replication site. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | shilpa <smanjara> |
| Component: | RGW-Multisite | Assignee: | shilpa <smanjara> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vidushi Mishra <vimishra> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | lysanche |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.3 | CC: | bhull, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, hklein, kdreyer, mkasturi, rmandyam, roemerso, tserlin, vereddy, vimishra, vumrao |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.3z3 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.2.10-161.el8cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Ensure `num_shards=0` for multi-site sync is properly represented
Previously, multi-site sync would cause segmentation fault when a bucket had `num_shards=0` causing inconsistent sync behavior and segmentation fault.
With this release, ensure `num_shards=0` is properly represented in data sync.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-05-23 00:19:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2203283 | ||
|
Description
shilpa
2023-04-19 14:06:09 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3259 *** Bug 2181646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |