Bug 2189271
| Summary: | a request - include pg_auto_failover in EPEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | lejeczek <peljasz> |
| Component: | pg_auto_failover | Assignee: | Ondřej Sloup <osloup> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 39 | CC: | allan.h.nielsen, fjanus, hhorak, mkulik, osloup |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pg_auto_failover-2.0-3.fc40 pg_auto_failover-2.0-3.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-09-14 16:28:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
lejeczek
2023-04-24 15:35:50 UTC
I'm branching the pg_auto_failover to EPEL9. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101034229 I needed to remove Latex docs as https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive is not in EPEL9. Created a pull request: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pg_auto_failover/pull-request/5 Hi Will you consider EPEL8 as well ? Regards Allan This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 39 development cycle. Changing version to 39. FEDORA-2023-968fae81ac has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-968fae81ac FEDORA-2023-968fae81ac has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b623cdc64 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b623cdc64 (In reply to Allan Harry Nielsen from comment #3) > Hi > > Will you consider EPEL8 as well ? > > Regards Allan I do not think that it is wise to put this package in EPEL8, as well as the package would have to be considerably reworked as specific building packages/options are missing in EPEL8. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b623cdc64 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b623cdc64 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4b623cdc64 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |