Bug 2193288

Summary: Review Request: f3d - Fast and minimalist 3D viewer.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felix Wang <topazus>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Status: ASSIGNED --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: benson_muite, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Desktop
Target Release: ---Flags: benson_muite: fedora-review?
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5875067 to 5897230
none
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5897230 to 6142575 none

Description Felix Wang 2023-05-05 03:41:11 UTC
SPEC URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f3d.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f3d-2.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
Fast and minimalist 3D viewer. 

Fedora Account System Username: topazus

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-05 04:08:15 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5875067
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2193288-f3d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05875067-f3d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Benson Muite 2023-05-05 11:47:23 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
  file-validate if there is such a file.


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright*
     BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright* [generated file]", "MIT
     License". 693 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in
     /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/f3d/2193288-f3d/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr/share/mime,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, /usr/share/mime/packages
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/thumbnailers(mypaint, libjxl, gnome-directory-thumbnailer,
     gdk-pixbuf2, librsvg2, gnome-epub-thumbnailer, gnome-kra-ora-
     thumbnailer, libgsf, tiled, eom)
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: f3d-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          f3d-devel-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          f3d-python3-f3d-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          f3d-debuginfo-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          f3d-debugsource-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
          f3d-2.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
=========================================================== rpmlint session starts ==========================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpi1nsw8sl')]
checks: 31, packages: 6

f3d-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-alembic.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-assimp.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-exodus.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-occt.so
f3d-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
f3d-python3-f3d.x86_64: W: no-documentation
f3d.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d.so libf3d.so
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_alembic.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_alembic.json
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_assimp.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_assimp.json
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_occt.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_occt.json
=========================== 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 9.3 s ===========================




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: f3d-debuginfo-2.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
=========================================================== rpmlint session starts ==========================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmppl1y0d_v')]
checks: 31, packages: 1

============================ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 2.6 s ===========================





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 5

f3d-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-alembic.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-assimp.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-exodus.so
f3d.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-occt.so
f3d-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
f3d-python3-f3d.x86_64: W: no-documentation
f3d.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libf3d.so libf3d.so
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_alembic.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_alembic.json
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_assimp.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_assimp.json
f3d.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/f3d/configs/thumbnail.d/10_occt.json /usr/share/f3d/configs/config.d/10_occt.json
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 10.8 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
f3d: /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-alembic.so
f3d: /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-assimp.so
f3d: /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-exodus.so
f3d: /usr/lib64/libf3d-plugin-occt.so
f3d: /usr/lib64/libf3d.so
f3d-python3-f3d: /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/f3d.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/archive/v2.0.0/f3d-2.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 5b335de78a9f68903d7023d947090d4b36fa15b9e165749906a82153e0f56d05
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5b335de78a9f68903d7023d947090d4b36fa15b9e165749906a82153e0f56d05


Requires
--------
f3d (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    glibc
    libAlembic.so.1.8()(64bit)
    libGLEW.so.2.2()(64bit)
    libOpenGL.so.0()(64bit)
    libTKBRep.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKIGES.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKLCAF.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKMath.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKMesh.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKXCAF.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKXDEIGES.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKXDESTEP.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKXSBase.so.7()(64bit)
    libTKernel.so.7()(64bit)
    libassimp.so.5()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libf3d.so()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
    libvtkCommonCore.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkCommonDataModel.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkCommonExecutionModel.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkCommonMath.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkCommonSystem.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkCommonTransforms.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkFiltersCore.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkFiltersGeneral.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkFiltersGeometry.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOCityGML.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOExodus.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOGeometry.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOImage.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOImport.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOPLY.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOParallel.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkIOXML.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkImagingCore.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkImagingHybrid.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkInteractionStyle.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkInteractionWidgets.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkRenderingAnnotation.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkRenderingCore.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkRenderingOpenGL2.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtkRenderingVolumeOpenGL2.so.1()(64bit)
    libvtksys.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

f3d-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cmake-filesystem(x86-64)
    f3d(x86-64)

f3d-python3-f3d (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    f3d(x86-64)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libf3d.so()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
    python(abi)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

f3d-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

f3d-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
f3d:
    application()
    application(f3d-plugin-alembic.desktop)
    application(f3d-plugin-assimp.desktop)
    application(f3d-plugin-native.desktop)
    application(f3d-plugin-occt.desktop)
    application(f3d.desktop)
    f3d
    f3d(x86-64)
    libf3d-plugin-alembic.so()(64bit)
    libf3d-plugin-assimp.so()(64bit)
    libf3d-plugin-exodus.so()(64bit)
    libf3d-plugin-occt.so()(64bit)
    libf3d.so()(64bit)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(app.f3d.F3D.metainfo.xml)
    mimehandler(application/dicom)
    mimehandler(application/gml+xml)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.3ds)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.abc)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.dae)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.fbx)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.mhd)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.nrrd)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.off)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.ply)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.pts)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.step)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vti)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vtk)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vtm)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vtp)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vtr)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vts)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.vtu)
    mimehandler(application/x-tgif)
    mimehandler(image/vnd.dxf)
    mimehandler(model/gltf+json)
    mimehandler(model/gltf-binary)
    mimehandler(model/iges)
    mimehandler(model/obj)
    mimehandler(model/stl)
    mimehandler(model/vrml)

f3d-devel:
    cmake(f3d)
    f3d-devel
    f3d-devel(x86-64)

f3d-python3-f3d:
    f3d-python3
    f3d-python3-f3d
    f3d-python3-f3d(x86-64)

f3d-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    f3d-debuginfo
    f3d-debuginfo(x86-64)

f3d-debugsource:
    f3d-debugsource
    f3d-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2193288
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Haskell, Java, R, PHP, SugarActivity, Ruby, Ocaml, fonts, Python, Perl
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comments:
a) Main license seems to be BSD-3-Clause with a few files under MIT license.  Is it possible
to add a license breakdown in the spec file?
b) Can the Java bindings also be built?
c) Can files in external directory be obtained from those packaged in Fedora?
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/external/json.hpp
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/external/cxxopts.hpp
If not, spec file should indicate they are bundled.
d) Building the example may be useful as a basic functionality test
e) Please use desktop-file-validate see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_file_creation
f) libraries in main package should have sonames, in particular libf3d, plugin libraries used only
internally need not have sonames, but should then be in a subdirectory not in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
g) devel package should have libraries without sonames, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/#_libraries
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_soname_handling
h) Where possible list file extensions used rather than just including an entire directory, for example
%files devel
%{_includedir}/f3d/*.h
%{_libdir}/cmake/f3d/*.cmake
%{_libdir}/cmake/f3d/*.in

Comment 3 Felix Wang 2023-05-06 08:45:08 UTC
Thanks for your reviewing the package.

a) Main license seems to be BSD-3-Clause with a few files under MIT license.  Is it possible
to add a license breakdown in the spec file?

The main license is under BSD-3-Clause license, the external libraries of cxxopts and nlohmann-json are under MIT license. For the testing data, I disable the tests. Do I also need to add the license of the testing data?

ref: https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/doc/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES.md
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/testing/data/DATA_LICENSES.md

b) Can the Java bindings also be built?

I added build option of the java binding.

c) Can files in external directory be obtained from those packaged in Fedora?
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/external/json.hpp
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/blob/master/external/cxxopts.hpp

opened the issue from the upstream repository. https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/issues/801

d) Building the example may be useful as a basic functionality test

I do not see the example building of the source code.

e) Please use desktop-file-validate see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_file_creation

added this desktop file validation.

f) libraries in main package should have sonames, in particular libf3d, plugin libraries used only
internally need not have sonames, but should then be in a subdirectory not in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
g) devel package should have libraries without sonames, see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/#_libraries
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_soname_handling

issue: https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/issues/801

h) Where possible list file extensions used rather than just including an entire directory, for example
%files devel
%{_includedir}/f3d/*.h
%{_libdir}/cmake/f3d/*.cmake
%{_libdir}/cmake/f3d/*.in

have done this.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-08 19:52:52 UTC
Created attachment 1963375 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5875067 to 5897230

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2023-05-08 19:52:54 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5897230
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2193288-f3d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05897230-f3d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Benson Muite 2023-05-21 12:27:16 UTC
Adding soname seems possible:
https://github.com/f3d-app/f3d/pull/822

Comment 8 Benson Muite 2023-05-21 12:30:38 UTC
Additional fedora-review messages:

- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on javapackages-tools
  (jpackage-utils)
- Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
  subpackage
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present. Note: Javadocs are optional for
  Fedora versions >= 21
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation
- Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-05 03:44:14 UTC
Created attachment 1974058 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5897230 to 6142575

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-05 03:44:17 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6142575
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2193288-f3d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06142575-f3d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.