Bug 2196046

Summary:	Branch and build for the epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Matej Focko <mfocko>
Component:	python-asyncssh	Assignee:	Georg Sauthoff <fedora>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel9	CC:	cbodley, fedora, kas, kdreyer, ktdreyer
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-asyncssh-2.13.2-3.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-07-20 00:35:56 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matej Focko 2023-05-07 19:15:36 UTC

Hi, could you please branch and build this package for EL9? It is a dependency of Ceph packages that are also used in RHEL9. Thanks a lot.

If you need any help, feel free to reach out.

Comment 1 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-09 21:59:20 UTC

I've just requested an epel9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/53142

Let's see if it builds out of the box there.

However, I don't want to invest too much effort into RHEL9 package maintenance, so I'll let you know when I need support.

There is already an epel8 branch which is maintained by Ken Dreyer (ktdreyer) so perhaps he is also interested in maintaining/co-maintaining the epel9 branch.

Comment 2 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-10 23:04:00 UTC

Branch is now live and first build is submitted: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100993827

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-05-17 18:36:20 UTC

Thanks for reporting the test failures upstream in https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566

I suggest we conditionally skip the test failures on RHEL 9 for now. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asyncssh/pull-request/5

Comment 4 Georg Sauthoff 2023-05-27 12:21:00 UTC

Pushed your change to the epel9 branch where the build now succeeded:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101563132

Comment 5 Georg Sauthoff 2023-06-04 15:36:30 UTC

Ron fixed the tests in his repository: https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566#issuecomment-1565729994

Can someone who actually runs RHEL9 test his changes and provide him feedback?

Comment 6 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2023-06-05 20:12:22 UTC

Sure, I've tested it on a RHEL 9 VM and reported back. Looks like we'll be able to ship a new version with the upstream fixes soon.

Comment 7 Casey Bodley 2023-07-12 15:00:54 UTC

https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566 has been resolved. is there anything else blocking this?

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-07-12 20:07:31 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba

Comment 9 Georg Sauthoff 2023-07-12 20:09:34 UTC

(In reply to Casey Bodley from comment #7)
> https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/issues/566 has been resolved. is there
> anything else blocking this?

No, I've updated the epel9 branch, re-enabled the tests and pushed the update to bodhi.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2023-07-13 01:52:08 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2023-07-20 00:35:56 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7c07d87fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.