Bug 2196403
| Summary: | mds: wait for unlink operation to finish | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Xiubo Li <xiubli> |
| Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Xiubo Li <xiubli> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Amarnath <amk> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Akash Raj <akraj> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.3 | CC: | akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, gfarnum, hyelloji, tserlin, vshankar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.3z4 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.2.10-179.el8cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Link request no longer fail with `-EXDEV`
Previously, if an inode had more than one link and one of its dentries was unlinked, it would be moved to the stray directory. Due to this, if a link request came before the _link merge_/_migrate_ completed, it would fail with `-EXDEV` error.
With this fix, waiting for the previous _link merge_/_migrate_ to finish or purging operations to finish link requests allows link operations to succeed.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-07-19 16:19:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2210690 | ||
|
Description
Xiubo Li
2023-05-09 01:59:00 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:4213 |