Bug 219891
Summary: | xen SDL framebuffer uses busy polling loop | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Stephen Tweedie <sct> | ||||
Component: | xen | Assignee: | Chris Lalancette <clalance> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | xen-maint | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-10 15:56:46 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Stephen Tweedie
2006-12-15 23:41:14 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. This request was previously evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release, but Red Hat was unable to resolve it in time. This request will be reviewed for a future Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Created attachment 217981 [details]
Patch to convert the sdlfb busy looping with a thread implementation
This is a patch to replace the busy loop in sdlfb with a thread and a pipe. I
might have been a little pedantic on the locking in here; I wasn't quite sure
if xenfb could be changed by both threads at the same time, so I went very
cautiously and locked every time I accessed it. I'll have to look into it a
little more, and possibly take some of the locking away (or remove it
altogether if I can convince myself the two threads don't change the same part
of the xenfb structure).
Chris Lalancette
The consensus on virtualist seems to be that this is not worth pursuing; few customers are using SDL, even fewer would even notice the busy wait, and upstream is going to be getting rid of sdlfb in favor of a merged Qemu solution. I'm going to close this as WONTFIX. Chris Lalancette |