Bug 220126

Summary: Cannot connect to smb share
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Adam Huffman <bloch>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Alexander Larsson <alexl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-11 11:24:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Adam Huffman 2006-12-19 00:39:20 UTC
Description of problem:
This problem seems to be related to, but not quite the same as,

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214343

and

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214183

This evening I was trying to connect to an smb share on my local network, from
an FC6 installation created last week.

At first I came across the problem that Nautilus was trying to connect as guest,
but even when I tried using the user@host syntax, the mount still failed,
whereas connecting to the share with smbclient and the same credentials succeeds.

Here are the relevant messages:

kernel: gnome-vfs-daemo[9600]: segfault at 0000000000000020 rip 0000003
331634f24 rsp 00000000409ff940 error 6

process 3833: arguments to dbus_pending_call_unref() were incorrect, assertion
"pending != NU
LL" failed in file dbus-pending-call.c line 563.
This is normally a bug in some application using the D-Bus library.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nautilus-2.16.2-5.fc6

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use nautilus to connect to an smb share
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Error "Unable to connect"

Expected results:
Connect to the share 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Alexander Larsson 2006-12-19 09:34:20 UTC
Can you try the gnome-vfs2-2.16.2-2.fc6 update?


Comment 2 Adam Huffman 2006-12-19 19:03:54 UTC
Just tried that update and I get the same error.

Comment 3 Adam Huffman 2006-12-19 19:58:54 UTC
Actually, upon trying again it does seem to work with that update, thanks.