Bug 2203413

Summary: ALG support requires TC offload to be disabled
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Greg Rakauskas <gregraka>
Component: documentationAssignee: Greg Rakauskas <gregraka>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 16.2 (Train)CC: gregraka, gurpsing, hakhande, jamsmith, mleitner
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-17 16:05:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2208568    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Greg Rakauskas 2023-05-12 15:05:30 UTC
----------------------------------------------------
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:26 AM Franck Baudin wrote:

Hello,

I suggest enhancing our RHOCP and RHOSP Networking documentation to
include "if ALG support is required, tc offload must be disabled".
This should not be a deal breaker for the OVS-DPDK customers  moving
to TC Flower offload, as OVS-DPDK has no ALG support, but I wonder
about others. At least it cannot hurt to add this mention. WDYT?

https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/b292cce2ff5336524874b80da26b60c653984ca4

Best Regards,
Franck


-----------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:36 PM Gurpreet Singh wrote:

Hi Greg

Is this something we can incorporate in our OSP documentation? Please let me know if you want me to create a bz for this.

Regards
Gurpreet


-----------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:50 PM Greg Rakauskas wrote:

Hi Gurpreet,

James and I can investigate this further and get back to you.

Thanks,
--Greg


--------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:27 AM James Smith wrote:

Gurpreet, sounds like we should add to the docs.
We can create a BZ if you like.

Thanks,
James

Comment 8 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2023-05-19 18:35:07 UTC
FTR, we also need a note saying that in 17.1, such flows are expected to not offload.
New bz then: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208568