Bug 220784
Summary: | Please move kxsconfig and friends to own (sub)package | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Julian Sikorski <belegdol> |
Component: | kdeartwork-extras | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | rdieter, than |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-02-26 16:55:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Julian Sikorski
2006-12-26 20:55:16 UTC
To build/include kxsconfig, kdeartwork needs BR: xscreensaver which isn't available for Core 6. (It can/will be for F7). We *can* however, make a kdeartwork-kxsconfig subpkg for rss-glx-kde to depend on. (Though I'm not entirely sure if that in itself would be sufficient to make rss-gls-kde function fully). Just checked rss-glx, rss-glx-kde already Requires: rss-glx-xscreensaver which Requires: xscreensaver-base So making the change you propose wouldn't reduce dependencies much (you would get out of xscreesaver-extras*) I don't consider this small of a gain worth messing with really. OK, changed my mind. (: I'll look into the kdeartwork-ksxconfig subpkg option. %changelog * Tue Jan 02 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject.org> 3.5.5-3 - -kxs subpkg (#220784) - BR: libart_lgpl-devel To be clear, new subpkg is named kdeartwork-kxs, which Requires: xscreensaver-base kdeartwork-extras now also Requires: kdeartwork-kxs This should get you the separation you wanted. I'll push this to devel branch, and let it simmer for awhile. If we hear no screams of horror after ~1 week, I'll push it to FC-5/FC-6 branches too. Just to be 1000% sure: xscreensaver-base is required as a runtime dependency as well, or just as a build one? xscreensaver-base is both a runtime and buildtime dependency. There may be ways of getting rid of the runtime dependency if that's a problem. Shall we close this? I lied, I hadn't pushed this to FC-5/FC-6 yet as promised, but will soon, then I'll close it. FC-6 build queued. |