Bug 2209073

Summary:	Please explain if "accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval" should apply to RHEL8.2+ or not
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Renaud Métrich <rmetrich>
Component:	scap-security-guide	Assignee:	Vojtech Polasek <vpolasek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milan Lysonek <mlysonek>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Petr Hybl <phybl>
Priority:	medium
Version:	8.7	CC:	ggasparb, jcerny, jjaburek, matyc, mhaicman, mjahoda, mlysonek, vpolasek, wsato
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged, ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	scap-security-guide-0.1.69-1.el8	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.The SCAP rule `accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval` now covers new STIG IDs Previously, the SCAP Security Guide rule `accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval` did not cover RHEL-08-020012 and RHEL-08-020013. Consequently, the rule `accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval` checked for `faillock` configuration in all of these three files: `/etc/pam.d/password-auth`, `/etc/pam.d/system-auth`, and `/etc/security/faillock.conf`. With this update, the rule now covers STIG IDs RHEL-08-020012 and RHEL-08-020013.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2228465 2228466 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-14 15:36:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2228465, 2228466

Description Renaud Métrich 2023-05-22 13:47:20 UTC

Description of problem:

Reading the rule description, from STIG official webpage https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/red_hat_enterprise_linux_8/2022-12-06/finding/V-230334:
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------
Note: This check applies to RHEL versions 8.0 and 8.1, if the system is RHEL version 8.2 or newer, this check is not applicable.
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------

The above text seems to infer that the rule "accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval" should not apply to RHEL8.2 and later.

But scanning for STIG on a 8.6 or later system shows the rule executes.

Please tell us if it's a rule bug or if it's more the checks listed to confirm compliance that do not apply to RHEL8.2 or later:
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------
$ sudo grep pam_faillock.so /etc/pam.d/password-auth

auth required pam_faillock.so preauth dir=/var/log/faillock silent audit deny=3 even_deny_root fail_interval=900 unlock_time=0
auth required pam_faillock.so authfail dir=/var/log/faillock unlock_time=0
account required pam_faillock.so

If the "fail_interval" option is not set to "900" or less (but not "0") on the "preauth" lines with the "pam_faillock.so" module, or is missing from this line, this is a finding.

$ sudo grep pam_faillock.so /etc/pam.d/system-auth
...
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

scap-security-guide

How reproducible:

Always

Comment 1 Vojtech Polasek 2023-05-25 07:45:49 UTC

Hello Renaud,
this rule is a bit special - it actually covers also this STIG item:
https://stigaview.com/products/rhel8/v1r9/RHEL-08-020013/
It decides what to do based on presence of Authselect, so it works for all RHEL 8 systems.
I think we should include the STIGID I have posted above into the rule reference so that it does not confuse people. Would this solve the issue?
Best regards,
Vojta

Comment 2 Renaud Métrich 2023-05-25 08:55:02 UTC

Hello,

thanks for the information, you may indeed add the stigid, I think it's more the STIG text in the rule that is confusing.

Comment 4 Vojtech Polasek 2023-07-18 08:03:21 UTC

Fixed upstream: https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/pull/10846

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-14 15:36:38 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (scap-security-guide bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:7056