Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2209213

Summary:	[DDF] The package needs to be updated RHEL9 packages, as RHCS 6.x works only with RHEl9.
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Documentation sub component:	DDF	QA Contact:	Manisha Saini <msaini>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	Docs Contact:
Severity:	urgent
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	akraj, hyelloji, mkasturi, msaini, rmandyam, rpollack, vdas, vereddy
Version:	6.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	6.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-06-21 06:59:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-05-23 06:28:28 UTC

The package needs to be updated RHEL9 packages, as RHCS 6.x works only with RHEl9.



Reported by: pdhiran

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/6/html/troubleshooting_guide/contacting-red-hat-support-for-service#annotations:55122c58-59bf-4a4a-ad9f-dacd84c978d2

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-05-23 06:28:35 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 7 Rivka Pollack 2023-06-04 07:12:18 UTC

Thanks, @msaini 
Should both of these be rhel 9 only or rhel 8 and rhel 9 examples for customer use?

as you know, we are reviewing and updating these changes also through RHEL-6401

Comment 8 Manisha Saini 2023-06-05 06:58:03 UTC

(In reply to Rivka Pollack from comment #7)
> Thanks, @msaini 
> Should both of these be rhel 9 only or rhel 8 and rhel 9 examples for
> customer use?
> 
> as you know, we are reviewing and updating these changes also through
> RHEL-6401

This should be for RHEL 9 only.

Comment 10 Manisha Saini 2023-06-07 20:01:39 UTC

Thanks Rivka. Will plan for verification

Comment 12 Manisha Saini 2023-06-08 13:38:44 UTC

Please Note - We have not yet reviewed the file-system and object-gateway guide.
These will be reviewed by Madhavi and Hemanth.

Comment 16 Manisha Saini 2023-06-09 04:25:23 UTC

Changes looks good to me.Marking this BZ as verified