Bug 2210024

Summary:	[RHEL9] st driver unit attention behavior over iSCSI
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	John Pittman <jpittman>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	John Meneghini <jmeneghi>
kernel sub component:	Storage Drivers	QA Contact:	Martin Hoyer <mhoyer>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	high
Priority:	high	CC:	alex.wang, casl, ccalhoun, cleech, foleybenson4841759, jhutz, jmagrini, jmeneghi, jpittman, loberman, mgandhi, mhoyer, mpatalan, revers
Version:	9.2	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Milestone:	rc	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	kernel-5.14.0-364.el9	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1930388	Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-04-30 10:10:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1930388
Bug Blocks:

Comment 6 John Meneghini 2023-08-30 16:42:38 UTC

The patch that addressed this issue in the st driver has been accepted upstream.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20230822181413.1210647-1-jmeneghi@redhat.com/

Targeting this fix for RHEL 9.4.

Comment 11 John Meneghini 2023-08-30 20:45:24 UTC

Marco, can you please set qa_ack+ on this.  This is for RHEL 9.4.

Comment 12 John Meneghini 2023-09-01 14:14:18 UTC

We have no good way to test this change so I am setting OtherQA.

Comment 13 Jeffrey Hutzelman 2023-09-01 14:29:27 UTC

Unfortunately, our application is still running on RHEL7, so it's not easy for us to test.
I will look into the possibility of moving at least the test tier to RHEL9 in the next couple of months, but there is a good chance I won't be able to work on it until sometime next year.

Comment 14 John Meneghini 2023-09-01 14:38:44 UTC

(In reply to Jeffrey Hutzelman from comment #13)
> Unfortunately, our application is still running on RHEL7, so it's not easy
> for us to test.
> I will look into the possibility of moving at least the test tier to RHEL9
> in the next couple of months, but there is a good chance I won't be able to
> work on it until sometime next year.

OK. Thanks Jeffrey.  Then I think we are just going to merge this change into RHEL 8.10 and 9.4.  After this I can create a RHEL7 zstream patch for you to test.

Comment 23 Martin Hoyer 2023-09-19 09:10:11 UTC

Tested by CEE in the CEE lab. 
Our regression tests have not found any issue.

Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2024-04-30 10:10:00 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2394

Comment 26 Coronel 2024-07-16 04:55:26 UTC

(In reply to errata-xmlrpc from comment #25)
> Since the problem described in this bug report should be
> resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
> resolution of ERRATA.
> 
> For information on the advisory (Important: kernel security, bug fix, and
> enhancement update), and where to find the updated
> files, follow the link below.
> 
> If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2394 https://blockblastonline.com



Thank bro.