Bug 2210161

Summary: autofs fails to start with combination of +auto.master and local direct map lookups after upgrading to 5.1.4-93.el8
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Ian Kent <ikent>
Component: autofsAssignee: Ian Kent <ikent>
Status: VERIFIED --- QA Contact: Kun Wang <kunwan>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 9.2CC: fsorenso, ikent, jke, jpetrini, kunwan, rakkumar, tc.staff, xzhou
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: autofs-5.1.7-51.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2208408 Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2208408    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 Ian Kent 2023-06-26 08:09:26 UTC
*** Bug 2216535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 James Petrini 2023-07-04 13:56:16 UTC
Hello my customer would like the hotfix for rhel 9.2 Case 03534352   ( the availability of which was offered in recently closed duplicate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216535

Comment 8 James Petrini 2023-07-26 11:22:17 UTC
customer would like to test a  hotfix for rhel 9.2 if its available. Please advise/estimate  new timeline for rhel 9.3 errata

Comment 12 James Petrini 2023-08-14 08:34:16 UTC
customer confirmed they have access to z-stream 
  I can do the process  for requesting fix  - Ian, do you have a link to details ?

Comment 13 Ian Kent 2023-08-15 00:48:20 UTC
(In reply to James Petrini from comment #12)
> customer confirmed they have access to z-stream 
>   I can do the process  for requesting fix  - Ian, do you have a link to
> details ?

Well I have seen the document but it's a support procedure so I don't
know it's location.

David Wysochanski would be able to help

Comment 14 Ian Kent 2023-08-15 00:53:47 UTC
(In reply to Ian Kent from comment #13)
> (In reply to James Petrini from comment #12)
> > customer confirmed they have access to z-stream 
> >   I can do the process  for requesting fix  - Ian, do you have a link to
> > details ?
> 
> Well I have seen the document but it's a support procedure so I don't
> know it's location.
> 
> David Wysochanski would be able to help

btw, mostly I can just do this myself but I know there are other steps that
are done by support which is why I mentioned it.

Please let me know if you can locate the documentation and if there is
anything that you need me to do besides setting zstream+, raising the
z-stream clone bug and applying the changes.