Bug 2210287
Summary: | The "dev" setting is ignored when it is used without address for passt interface | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | yalzhang <yalzhang> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Michal Privoznik <mprivozn> |
libvirt sub component: | Networking | QA Contact: | yalzhang <yalzhang> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | dgibson, dzheng, haizhao, jdenemar, lmen, lvivier, mprivozn, sbrivio, virt-maint |
Version: | 9.3 | Keywords: | AutomationBackLog, Triaged, Upstream |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-9.5.0-0rc1.1.el9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-11-07 08:31:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | 9.5.0 |
Embargoed: |
Description
yalzhang@redhat.com
2023-05-26 13:09:24 UTC
Patch posted on the list: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2023-June/240148.html To POST: commit 1c7335add9e28637d8a8b5039f487e5dc6a591c2 Author: Michal Prívozník <mprivozn> AuthorDate: Thu Jun 1 10:37:04 2023 +0200 Commit: Michal Prívozník <mprivozn> CommitDate: Thu Jun 1 14:25:08 2023 +0200 qemu_passt: Format portForward device even without address It's almost like we've anticipated this. Our XML parser and formatter handles @address and @dev attributes of <portForward/> element completely independent of each other. And as of commit 2023_03_29.b10b983~3 passt allows handling these two separately too. All that's left is generate the cmd line according to this new fact. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210287 Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn> Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko> v9.4.0-3-g1c7335add9 Hi Michal, the vm can not start successfully(See S3 below). Maybe it depends on a new passt build. Could you please help to confirm? Thank you! S1: with both dev and address: $ virsh dumpxml test1 --xpath //interface <interface type="user"> <mac address="52:54:00:26:44:e5"/> <source dev="eno1"/> <portForward proto="tcp" dev="eno1" address='10.73.178.71'> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> <model type="virtio"/> <backend type="passt"/> <address type="pci" domain="0x0000" bus="0x01" slot="0x00" function="0x0"/> </interface> will come up with: $ ps aux | grep '/usr/bin/passt' test 13544 0.0 0.2 76344 38124 ? Ss 01:20 0:00 /usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/2-test1-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:26:44:e5 --pid /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/2-test1-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports 10.73.178.71%eno1/41335 S2: only address <portForward proto="tcp" address='10.73.178.71'> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> VM start successfully and the passt process is like this: $ ps aux | grep '/usr/bin/passt' test 13622 0.0 0.2 76344 38828 ? Ss 01:21 0:00 /usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/3-test1-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:26:44:e5 --pid /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/3-test1-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports 10.73.178.71/41335 S3: only dev, vm can not start successfully <portForward proto="tcp" dev="eno1"> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> $ virsh start test1 error: Failed to start domain 'test1' error: internal error: Child process (/usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/4-test1-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:26:44:e5 --pid /run/user/1000/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/4-test1-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports %eno1/41335) unexpected exit status 1: Invalid port specifier %eno1/41335 This BZ (it's pre-verification actually) is blocking libvirt packages from making it into a RHEL compose. Could this be pre-verified earlier than after the passt rebase in mid August? For example using passt from upstream or using a scratch build (aka rebase pre-release) or something similar? Test with upstream passt and libvirt, the result is as expected: # rpm -q passt libvirt passt-g023d684-1.x86_64 libvirt-9.5.0-3.el9.x86_64 # getenforce Permissive 1) with address and interface: # virsh dumpxml rhel --xpath //portForward <portForward proto="tcp" address="10.73.178.37" dev="eno1"> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> the passt cmdline: # ps aux | grep 'usr/bin/passt' | grep -v grep qemu 5574 0.0 0.0 72936 37628 ? Ss 02:54 0:00 /usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/7-rhel-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:49:84:12 --pid /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/7-rhel-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports 10.73.178.37%eno1/41335 2) with address only: # virsh dumpxml rhel --xpath //portForward <portForward proto="tcp" address="10.73.178.37"> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> the passt cmd line: # ps aux | grep 'usr/bin/passt' | grep -v grep qemu 5692 0.0 0.0 72932 36628 ? Ss 02:55 0:00 /usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/8-rhel-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:49:84:12 --pid /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/8-rhel-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports 10.73.178.37/41335 3) with interface only: # virsh dumpxml rhel --xpath //portForward <portForward proto="tcp" dev="eno1"> <range start="41335"/> </portForward> the passt cmdline: # ps aux | grep 'usr/bin/passt' | grep -v grep qemu 5779 0.0 0.0 72932 36632 ? Ss 02:56 0:00 /usr/bin/passt --one-off --socket /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/9-rhel-net0.socket --mac-addr 52:54:00:49:84:12 --pid /run/libvirt/qemu/passt/9-rhel-net0-passt.pid --interface eno1 --tcp-ports %eno1/41335 Test with lastest passt downstream build, the result is as expected. libvirt-9.5.0-5.el9.x86_64 passt-0^20230818.g0af928e-4.el9.x86_64 passt-selinux-0^20230818.g0af928e-4.el9.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: libvirt security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:6409 |