Bug 2211307

Summary:	Keys returned by Admin API during user creation on secondary zone not valid
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Ali Maredia <amaredia>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Ali Maredia <amaredia>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Akash Raj <akraj>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, jthottan, mkasturi, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	6.1z1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-17.2.6-95.el9cp	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-08-03 16:45:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2221020

Description Ali Maredia 2023-05-31 05:58:24 UTC

Description of problem:

When in a multisite configuration, user creation on a secondary zone via the admin API returns keys that are not valid.

When doing a radosgw-admin user info on the newly created user different keys are returned and these keys are valid.

This issue only happens with users created via the admin api on endpoints in secondary zones not on endpoints in the master zone.

Upstream Tracker (fix already merged in Reef) here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57724
Quincy Backport Tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58583

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 6.1


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2023-08-03 16:45:09 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:4473