Bug 2211956

Summary:	The customer can't see the .686 errata package to be installed via webUI. However, in the CH, they can see both version getting updated
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Odilon Sousa <osousa>
Component:	Hosts - Content	Assignee:	Lucy Fu <lufu>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Sam Bible <sbible>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.11.5	CC:	ahumbe, jlenz, juwatts, lufu, rlavi
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	tfm-rubygem-katello-4.7.0.26-1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	2168414	Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-01-29 20:11:47 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 6 Sam Bible 2023-06-25 17:26:34 UTC

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.13.2 - Snap 2

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Sync RHEL8 Appstream and RHEL8 BaseOS repos to Satellite
2. Register a Host with Satellite
3. Install systemd-libs.i686 and systemd-libs.x86_64 on the Host
4. Downgrade both packages on the host using 'yum downgrade <package_name>'
5. Compare the results of running 'yum update systemd-libs' on the host with what Satellite reports in the Upgradable view under the Host's packages.


Actual results:
Both packages are marked for upgrade on the Host, while Satellite either doesn't show the i686 package ( Old content Host UI behavior ), or marks 
it as Up-to-Date

Expected results:
Both Versions should correctly be marked for update. 

Additional Info: 
Here are some screenshots from both the Host and Satellite to illustrate what's going on. 
Host: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1972508
Satellite: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1972509

Comment 9 Bryan Kearney 2024-01-17 20:02:21 UTC

Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/36100 has been resolved.

Comment 10 Brad Buckingham 2024-01-29 20:11:47 UTC

Closing this as a duplicate of the clone bug 2168414 which was delivered in 6.14.0.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2168414 ***