Bug 2212804

Summary: dracut prompt is never reached when requiring networking but no DHCP is listening on the network
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Renaud Métrich <rmetrich>
Component: dracutAssignee: dracut-maint-list
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 8.8Keywords: MigratedToJIRA
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-20 23:25:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Renaud Métrich 2023-06-06 12:18:43 UTC
Description of problem:

When customers try to install systems over the network and specify nothing for "ip" parameter (hence defaulting to DHCP), but a inst.repo for example, dracut tries forever to get the IP address over DHCP.
If there is no DHCP service listening, which is very common, then the system waits several hours until dracut emergency prompt is reached.
The only message we see is:
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------
         Starting dracut initqueue hook...
[    9.426013] TECH PREVIEW: NVMe/TCP may not be fully supported.
[    9.426013] Please review provided documentation for limitations.
[    9.751210] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp1s0: link is not ready
[    9.752011] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp1s0: link is not ready
[    9.752538] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device enp1s0
[    9.759817] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp1s0: link is not ready
[    9.761097] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): enp1s0: link is not ready
[    9.824009] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp1s0: link becomes ready
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------

Then nothing happens, which is quite confusing, because the admin doesn't know what's happening at all.

Booting with rd.debug, we can see that the initqueue loop iterates "slowly" (~ every 100 seconds), so eventually, after days, the dracut prompt will be reached:
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------
[  828.546445] dracut-initqueue[843]: /bin/dracut-initqueue@68(main): main_loop=9
 :
[  919.551251] dracut-initqueue[843]: /bin/dracut-initqueue@68(main): main_loop=10
-------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< --------

We need something to drop early, e.g. some absolute timeout, but also we need to report what is currently being waited for.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dracut-049

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Setup a QEMU/KVM with isolated network (no DHCP)
2. Boot by specifying kernel and initrd paths and "inst.repo=xxx" as kernel args

Actual results:

After 900 seconds, still at loop 10

Expected results:

After 180 seconds (the rd.retry default), getting the dracut prompt + regular messages stating "Getting IP address over DHCP" or similar

Additional info:

This is critical for a lot of customers, because DHCP is rarely used

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-20 23:25:05 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-20 23:25:42 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.