Bug 2214093

Summary: [DDF] This step isn't detailed here. There is a detailed explanation in the RHOSP 16 guide:
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: documentationAssignee: Jenny-Anne Lynch <jelynch>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 17.0 (Wallaby)CC: erpeters, gouthamr
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-07-21 12:03:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-06-11 18:28:58 UTC 
This step isn't detailed here. There is a detailed explanation in the RHOSP 16 guide: 

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/16.1/html/cephfs_back_end_guide_for_the_shared_file_system_service/cephfs-post-deploy_native-cephfs#cephfs-share-type_native-cephfs


We want to ensure that we call out why a default share type may not be desirable in this environment; and if one must be created, we want to show an example of how it can be configured to steer provisioning away from the cephfs backend... 

Section 12.4 is incomplete without this information

Reported by: rhn-engineering-gpachara

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/17.0/html/deploying_red_hat_ceph_storage_and_red_hat_openstack_platform_together_with_director/assembly_native-cephfs-post-deployment-configuration-and-verification#annotations:f1f5b0e3-3015-43e5-9f15-d9e9d0be6cb6