Bug 2214412

Summary: Document Missing "next version only" Recommendation. [RHEL 9]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Bernie Hoefer <bhoefer>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Filip Hanzelka <fhanzelk>
Documentation sub component: default QA Contact: RHEL DPM <rhel-docs>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: low    
Priority: medium CC: rhel-docs
Version: 9.2Keywords: Documentation
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-26 15:36:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2214410    

Description Bernie Hoefer 2023-06-12 22:03:09 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/html/installing_identity_management/update-downgrade-ipa_installing-identity-management#updating_idm_packages


Section Number and Name: 
11.1. Updating IdM packages


Describe the issue: 
IdM experts have recommended that users should not skip RHEL minor versions when updating their RHEL servers.  This has been documented for RHEL 7:

  _Linux Domain Identity, Authentication, and Policy Guide_
  Chapter 8.1.1, "Considerations for Updating Identity Management"
  https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/linux_domain_identity_authentication_and_policy_guide/updating-migrating#update-ipa-prereqs

...as well as in 2 Knowledge-Centered Service (KCS) solutions:

  Patching Red Hat Identity Management Server
  https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5414771

  Can I upgrade IdM/IPA skipping point releases? 
  https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5464801

Yet, the RHEL 9 documentation cited above lacks this warning.


Suggestions for improvement:
Customers should be warned of not skipping RHEL minor versions up front, in the documentation, instead of just in some KCS solutions they do not know to look for until a problem has already been encountered.