Bug 2215030

Summary:	Request to add rubygem-asciidoctor into CRB
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Marián Konček <mkoncek>
Component:	rubygem-asciidoctor	Assignee:	ruby maint <ruby-maint>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	RHEL CS Apps Subsystem QE <rhel-cs-apps-subsystem-qe>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	CentOS Stream	CC:	bstinson, dhodovsk, jskarvad, jwboyer
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-07-24 13:02:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marián Konček 2023-06-14 14:11:04 UTC

Description of problem:
rubygem-asciidoctor is a vital package to build documentation. I would like to have it in the CRB repository at least in c9s. We use it to test documentation generation in our CI. I know it is present in the buildroot but I want to to be easily installable in the centos:stream9 container.

See for example: https://github.com/fedora-java/jurand/blob/67fb975a85cce7aa209c0490dfff1418d5db82c1/.github/workflows/ci.yaml#L26
which requires modifying the configs.

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2023-06-15 08:25:45 UTC

I don't object this proposal in general. Nevertheless:

1) we should make sure the RHEL package version is aligned with Fedora. Specifically, the RHEL package makes sure the test suite is enabled:

https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/-/commit/d02280e27c7fa37a92c4b3b501246ce2a7895510

where the similar change was not accepted into Fedora yet:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-asciidoctor/pull-request/6

and that in turn would mean troubles for RHEL10.

2) rubygem-asciidoctor is available in EPEL. We would need to drop the package from there. And I think the whole idea was to have the Asciidoctor available, but not block community from innovating by (possibly) keeping the Asciidoctor without updates.

Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:21:43 UTC

+1

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:22:56 UTC

Or build root would be also OK for us.

Comment 4 Jaroslav Škarvada 2023-07-11 10:30:23 UTC

(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
> Or build root would be also OK for us.

Yep, it seems it's already in the RHEL-9 buildroot, so we (TuneD maintainers) are happy :)

Comment 5 Marián Konček 2023-07-24 13:02:42 UTC

I think the package being present in EPEL / buildroot is acceptable.