|Summary:||ia64: show_mem() for sparsemem NUMA|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5||Reporter:||George Beshers <gbeshers>|
|Component:||kernel||Assignee:||George Beshers <gbeshers>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Brian Brock <bbrock>|
|Version:||5.0||CC:||jes, jh, prarit|
|Fixed In Version:||RHBA-2008-0314||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-05-21 14:40:35 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||253733, 276281, 425461|
Description George Beshers 2007-01-05 17:04:24 UTC
Description of problem: The change from discontig to sparsemem undercut Jes's upstream patch to show_mem(). A new patch is now in the -mm tree awaiting a move to Linus' tree. The importance of this patch is that it provides more information about NUMA memory in a form that is more compact than the original discontig.c:show_mem(). It should be noted that this is one of the few ways of getting at this information when an error occurs in the field. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Will post to rhkernel-list when it goes into Linus' tree.
Comment 1 George Beshers 2007-01-05 17:04:24 UTC
Created attachment 144914 [details] patch accepted by Tony Luck and Andrew Morton.
Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-04-25 22:27:51 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.
Comment 3 Peter Martuccelli 2007-05-02 13:47:50 UTC
Conditional devel ACK, post when accepted into mainline.
Comment 5 Marizol Martinez 2007-06-06 21:28:35 UTC
Red Hat Product Management and Engineering have evaluated this request and currently plan to include it in the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux minor release. Please note that its inclusion depends upon the successful completion of code integration and testing.
Comment 6 Don Zickus 2007-07-19 19:50:15 UTC
rejected on rhkl, moving back to assign
Comment 7 Luming Yu 2007-08-27 13:25:43 UTC
The patch at comment#1 has been in upstream http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1c0afa2e8802c01cf82c915e2bb3cb2a81570d4 Is it reasonable to post the back port again?
Comment 8 Luming Yu 2007-08-28 08:19:30 UTC
Do you agree to re-post?
Comment 9 George Beshers 2007-08-28 14:46:42 UTC
Yes, I will re-post; 5.1 testing is winding down.
Comment 10 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:28:05 UTC
Created attachment 216391 [details] Leader to patch series
Comment 15 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:24:15 UTC
Created attachment 224591 [details] Old sysrq-m on altix6
Comment 16 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:24:52 UTC
Created attachment 224601 [details] new sysrq-m on altix6
Comment 17 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:25:28 UTC
Created attachment 224611 [details] combined patch against 2.6.18-52
Comment 18 George Beshers 2007-10-25 14:11:04 UTC
*** Bug 276281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Don Zickus 2007-12-14 18:34:03 UTC
in 2.6.18-60.el5 You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 14:40:35 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html