Bug 221612

Summary: ia64: show_mem() for sparsemem NUMA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: George Beshers <gbeshers>
Component: kernelAssignee: George Beshers <gbeshers>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: jes, jh, prarit
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ia64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0314 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 14:40:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 253733, 276281, 425461    
Description Flags
patch accepted by Tony Luck and Andrew Morton.
Leader to patch series
Old sysrq-m on altix6
new sysrq-m on altix6
combined patch against 2.6.18-52 none

Description George Beshers 2007-01-05 17:04:24 UTC
Description of problem:
  The change from discontig to sparsemem undercut Jes's
  upstream patch to show_mem().  A new patch is now in the
  -mm tree awaiting a move to Linus' tree.

  The importance of this patch is that it provides more information
  about NUMA memory in a form that is more compact than the original
  discontig.c:show_mem().  It should be noted that this is one of
  the few ways of getting at this information when an error occurs
  in the field.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Will post to rhkernel-list when it goes into Linus' tree.

Comment 1 George Beshers 2007-01-05 17:04:24 UTC
Created attachment 144914 [details]
patch accepted by Tony Luck and Andrew Morton.

Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-04-25 22:27:51 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update

Comment 3 Peter Martuccelli 2007-05-02 13:47:50 UTC
Conditional devel ACK, post when accepted into mainline.

Comment 5 Marizol Martinez 2007-06-06 21:28:35 UTC
Red Hat Product Management and Engineering have evaluated this request and
currently plan to include it in the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux minor release.
Please note that its inclusion depends upon the successful completion of code
integration and testing.

Comment 6 Don Zickus 2007-07-19 19:50:15 UTC
rejected on rhkl, moving back to assign

Comment 7 Luming Yu 2007-08-27 13:25:43 UTC
The patch at comment#1 has been in upstream

Is it reasonable to post the back port again?

Comment 8 Luming Yu 2007-08-28 08:19:30 UTC
Do you agree to re-post?

Comment 9 George Beshers 2007-08-28 14:46:42 UTC
Yes, I will re-post; 5.1 testing is winding down.

Comment 10 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:28:05 UTC
Created attachment 216391 [details]
Leader to patch series

Comment 11 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:28:42 UTC
Created attachment 216401 [details]

Comment 12 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:29:09 UTC
Created attachment 216411 [details]

Comment 13 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:29:48 UTC
Created attachment 216421 [details]

Comment 14 George Beshers 2007-10-04 20:30:32 UTC
Created attachment 216431 [details]

Comment 15 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:24:15 UTC
Created attachment 224591 [details]
Old sysrq-m on altix6

Comment 16 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:24:52 UTC
Created attachment 224601 [details]
new sysrq-m on altix6

Comment 17 George Beshers 2007-10-11 18:25:28 UTC
Created attachment 224611 [details]
combined patch against 2.6.18-52

Comment 18 George Beshers 2007-10-25 14:11:04 UTC
*** Bug 276281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 19 Don Zickus 2007-12-14 18:34:03 UTC
in 2.6.18-60.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 14:40:35 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.