Bug 2216766
Summary: | Make Toolbx a release-blocking deliverable and have release-blocking test criteria | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Aoife Moloney <amoloney> |
Component: | Changes Tracking | Assignee: | Debarshi Ray <debarshir> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 39 | CC: | awilliam, debarshir, kevin, sumukher, thrcka |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-11-14 18:57:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2242874, 2244503, 2245066 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 2158243 |
Description
Aoife Moloney
2023-06-22 13:37:30 UTC
so, best as I can tell: the pungi-fedora change is merged, but toolbox is *not* currently marked as fatal (i.e. it *is* marked as 'failable'). in today's compose, it succeeded on aarch64 and x86_64 but failed on s390x and ppc64le: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105067291 the release criterion has been added: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria#Toolbx_Functionality . we haven't yet added a wiki test case, I don't think. An openQA test is under review: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/pull-request/293 on the whole, I guess this adds up to MODIFIED... (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #1) > so, best as I can tell: the pungi-fedora change is merged, but toolbox is > *not* currently marked as fatal (i.e. it *is* marked as 'failable'). in > today's compose, it succeeded on aarch64 and x86_64 but failed on s390x and > ppc64le: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105067291 > > the release criterion has been added: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ > Fedora_39_Beta_Release_Criteria#Toolbx_Functionality . we haven't yet added > a wiki test case, I don't think. An openQA test is under review: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/pull-request/293 > > on the whole, I guess this adds up to MODIFIED... The wiki test case has always been there https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_toolbox Oh, good. We should probably add it to some validation matrix and category, though (base, I guess?) (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #3) > Oh, good. We should probably add it to some validation matrix and category, > though (base, I guess?) Sure, I agree. Can you point me to the template matrix? or do I edit the Base of a "current" validation image? I would call it [[Category:Container_Management]] There are existing categories loosely associated with the matrices. I'd add it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Base_test_matrix and put it in category Base_Acceptance_Test_Cases . Please send a draft to the ML or something for review, as editing the matrices is sensitive...thanks! FYI, I have merged the failable '' changes... The wiki change has been made, the openQA test was merged - I don't think we hooked up reporting yet, but I can do that easily today. I think this is good enough to call it ON_QA , unless anyone disagrees. Correction - actually we *did* hook up the wiki reporting, so openQA is already reporting results for the test. We did find a bunch of regressions at the last minute during the Fedora 39 Final Freeze: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242874 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244503 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245066 ... but, fortunately, they all got fixed. So, I suppose we are all set here for tomorrow Fedora 39 release? F39 was released on November 7th, so I am closing this tracker. If this Change was not completed, please notify me ASAP. |