Bug 2217128

Summary: Review Request: tigerbeetle - Distributed financial accounting database
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/tigerbeetledb/tigerbeetle
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Benson Muite 2023-06-24 05:51:52 UTC
spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/tigerbeetle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06109685-tigerbeetle/tigerbeetle.spec
srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/tigerbeetle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06109685-tigerbeetle/tigerbeetle-0.13.36-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description:
TigerBeetle is a financial accounting database designed for mission
critical safety and performance to power the future of financial services.

fas: fed500

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Package Review 2024-06-24 00:45:28 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 2 Benson Muite 2024-06-24 02:32:28 UTC
Will update, though depends on Zig also being updated.

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-06-25 00:45:20 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 4 Benson Muite 2025-06-27 06:38:54 UTC
Still of interest, though will need to update.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:15:18 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:18:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9819606
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2217128-tigerbeetle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09819606-tigerbeetle/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.