Bug 2217695
| Summary: | [RFE] accept different manifest name files of file repository | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Amar Ganbat <aganbat> |
| Component: | Pulp | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.12.4 | CC: | ahumbe, dalley, rlavi |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-07-17 18:23:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Amar Ganbat
2023-06-26 22:55:43 UTC
This could be a valid RFE, but the specific example provided isn't unfortunately. http://download.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/9.2/isos/x86_64/Rocky-9-latest-x86_64-boot.iso.manifest is not formatted in such a way that Pulp would ever recognize it as being a valid Pulp manifest. It's just a list of files inside the ISO, as opposed to a list of files in the directory along with their sizes and checksums. Even if the formatting was correct the files listed in the manifest don't actually exist, they're inside the ISO, not outside of it. What you would want instead is for them to provide a PULP_MANIFEST file in the directory where that file is hosted. I don't know that they will do that, though. Closing this - from pulp's perspective this is already possible, but not with this particular file. |