Bug 2217826
| Summary: | [Doc] [RFE] hammer recurring-logic list should display 'Action', 'Last Occurrence' and 'Next Occurrence' field which can be seen on Satellite web UI. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Aneta Šteflová Petrová <apetrova> |
| Component: | Tasks Plugin | Assignee: | Aneta Šteflová Petrová <apetrova> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.14.0 | CC: | aruzicka |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Documentation |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-06-28 08:28:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Aneta Šteflová Petrová
2023-06-27 08:07:28 UTC
I didn't find any instances of "hammer recurring-logic" in the docs set. Does that mean we can just close this or that it should be documented from the ground up? (In reply to Adam Ruzicka from comment #3) > Does that mean we can just close this or that it should be documented from > the ground up? I'd prefer not to add any new docs to the product *guides*. If this really is just about a change in behavior of a command (hammer recurring-logic) that was not documented before, I don't see a reason to document it now. Another option would be to publish a *release note*. But in my opinion, the change in behavior is too small even for that. What do you think? Would you be ok with not documenting this at all? Sure, fine by me Nothing to document here. |