Bug 2217827

Summary: [DOC] [RFE] Job review details should contain scheduling information
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Aneta Šteflová Petrová <apetrova>
Component: Remote ExecutionAssignee: Aneta Šteflová Petrová <apetrova>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.14.0CC: aruzicka
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Documentation
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-28 12:48:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-27 08:10:48 UTC
This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2158510

I am copying this bug because: 

This update is to be evaluated for doc impact.

Description of problem:
In the new Rex wizard, the Review page does not contain details about future execution or recurring execution settings.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.13 snap 4

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Schedule a rex job through new UI wizard
2. Set either future or recurring execution and specify some details on the related steps (e.g. starts at, ends after x occurrences...)
3. Get to the last step, almost all settings are listed but these scheduling details are not

Comment 3 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 11:03:16 UTC
The existing procedure (see c#2) does not need updating; it still applies as it is.

The update described in the web UI (additional details about a rex job) doesn't need any additional explaining in the documentation.

Comment 4 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 11:04:22 UTC
Adam, are you okay with *not* documenting these changes? See my explanation in comment#3.

Comment 5 Adam Ruzicka 2023-06-28 11:23:50 UTC
Yes, I'd be fine with that

Comment 6 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 12:48:04 UTC
Nothing to document here.