Bug 2218362

Summary:	selinux-policy-doc and container-selinux.8 manpage ownership
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	8.8	CC:	dwalsh, lsm5, lvrabec, mmalik, omosnacek, pkoncity, vmojzis, zpytela
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	selinux-policy-3.14.3-123.el8	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	2209120	Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-14 15:47:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2209120
Bug Blocks:

Description Zdenek Pytela 2023-06-28 20:41:14 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2209120 +++

The container_selinux.8 manpage is a part of upstream container-selinux and imho best owned by the container-selinux package.

I think it should be removed from selinux-policy-doc.

Reproducible: Didn't try

--- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-05-22 20:01:17 CEST ---

PTAL https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#

--- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-06-27 19:32:16 CEST ---

Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?

We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all distro versions.

--- Additional comment from Zdenek Pytela on 2023-06-27 20:08:16 CEST ---

(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> 
> We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> distro versions.

Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-146092

If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so let me know.

--- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-06-27 20:30:20 CEST ---

(In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3)
> (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> > 
> > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> > distro versions.
> 
> Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-
> 146092
> 
> If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so
> let me know.

Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA?

--- Additional comment from Zdenek Pytela on 2023-06-28 08:45:04 CEST ---

(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4)
> (In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> > > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> > > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> > > 
> > > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> > > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> > > distro versions.
> > 
> > Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-
> > 146092
> > 
> > If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so
> > let me know.
> 
> Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA?

We need a bz both for RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 if this is required.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-14 15:47:54 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:7091