Bug 221852
Summary: | Reading files on CIFS mount fails: "CIFS VFS: Send error in read = -13" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Peter Bieringer <pb> |
Component: | samba | Assignee: | Simo Sorce <ssorce> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Martin Jenner <mjenner> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | jplans, pb, samba-bugs-list, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-14 21:47:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Bieringer
2007-01-08 15:50:14 UTC
The comments above seem to indicate that this problem is due to a server-side samba bug. Is that the case? If you're still seeing the problem when mounting a share from a server running a recent version of samba, can you test a client using the kernels from my people page: http://people.redhat.com/jlayton ...and let me know if the problem still exists there? Note that this happen using F7 as client as RHEL4 as server (so vice-versa as you expected). The error occurs on client side, probably server side is the cause. So either a new samba version for RHEL4 or a new kernel for F7 are candidates for testing. So the provided kernel by you for RHEL4 (and suggested for client) would not help imho, but can give a try. Ok, it sounds like this is a samba problem. I'm going to reassign it as such. Please reassign back to me if it turns out to be something in CIFS. Can you please test the new samba version we have in the beta channel? If it is a samba server bug, that should fix it. Thanks. Since the last we have released packages that should have fixed this issue. Can you confirm/deny the issue is fixed in RHEL4 U6 ? Thanks. I have no longer access to the system (neither client nor server) - sorry. In addition I'm unsure that I have time to reproduce it in another environment. In this case I'll mark the bug as closed, I am confident we do not have this problem in the latest packages. |