Bug 2221275

Summary:	Consider renaming to blackboxwm
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Carl George 🤠 <carl>
Component:	blackbox	Assignee:	Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	matthias, rosset.filipe
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-07-19 22:28:07 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Carl George 🤠 2023-07-07 17:50:21 UTC

Would you consider renaming this package from blackbox to blackboxwm?  This would correspond to the upstream source repository name.

https://github.com/bbidulock/blackboxwm

It would also free up the blackbox package name for another project using that name.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/raggesilver/blackbox

Ideally both of these projects can be packaged in Fedora, or even be installed on the same system.  Renaming this package is one possible method for achieving that.  Other methods could work but I think this one makes the most sense.

If you're open to this but just don't have the time, I would be happy to help with the transition.

Comment 1 Carl George 🤠 2023-07-19 00:42:43 UTC

This is being discussed upstream as well.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/raggesilver/marble/-/issues/10

Comment 2 Filipe Rosset 2023-07-19 22:28:07 UTC

I believe it's better to change raggesilver/blackbox to blackbox-terminal or something like this.