Bug 2222868

Summary: [lapack] Rename MAX and MIN man pages that have conflicting names with man-pages package
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Lukas Javorsky <ljavorsk>
Component: lapackAssignee: Jakub Martisko <jamartis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Radka Brychtova <rskvaril>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: CentOS StreamCC: akrherz, bstinson, davide, jamartis, jwboyer, ngompa13, rskvaril, tdawson
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: lapack-3.9.0-10.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-07 08:37:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Lukas Javorsky 2023-07-14 08:26:07 UTC
Description of problem:
Please apply Fedora commit 0d1c821 to CentOS Stream lapack package, as the man-pages have conflicting names with man-pages package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lapack/c/0d1c8214fcfb79f81ca428543fe9fb29248bced3?branch=rawhide)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lapack-3.9.0-8.el9

How reproducible:
Always

Actual results:
Undeclared file conflicts:
man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch provides /usr/share/man/man3/MAX.3.gz which is also provided by lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64
man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch provides /usr/share/man/man3/MIN.3.gz which is also provided by lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64


Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:
Easy fix, only apply the patch already introduces in the Fedora lapack package

Comment 1 Lukas Javorsky 2023-07-14 08:27:34 UTC
Please aim for the RHEL-9.3 ITR as we are rebasing the man-pages in this timeframe due to a request from the RHIVOS team: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-683

Comment 4 Lukas Javorsky 2023-07-25 14:16:00 UTC
Hi, this issue starting to hit more and more people, could you please fix it?

It's a simple cherry-pick which shouldn't require much work.

Comment 5 Lukas Javorsky 2023-07-25 14:16:32 UTC
*** Bug 2225523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2023-08-09 01:47:34 UTC
This is now blocking my ability to further develop images in the CentOS Alternative Images SIG and the CentOS Hyperscale SIG.

Example failed build: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3534240

Excerpt from image-root.x86_64.log:

Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MAX.3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch and lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MIN.3.gz conflicts between attempted installs of man-pages-6.04-1.el9.noarch and lapack-3.9.0-8.el9.x86_64

Comment 8 Troy Dawson 2023-08-09 04:15:16 UTC
A fixed lapack has been built, but it is still in gating.
https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35237

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:37:06 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (lapack bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6555