Bug 222300

Summary: CDROM test fails. SELinux security violation
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Gregory Feiner <gregory.feiner>
Component: Test Suite (tests)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-11 20:54:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
CDROM test results.
none
SELinux sercurity violation during CDROM test. none

Description Gregory Feiner 2007-01-11 15:43:45 UTC 
Description of problem:
CDROM test fails. The error is: cp: cannot create directory `./device-
copy':Permission denied.  At the same time, SELinux pops up with a security 
violation stating: SELinux is preventing /bin/cp (iso9660_t) "associate" to 
device-copy (fs_t).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):HTS 5.0-15


How reproducible: Every time.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEL 5 to ProLiant DL320 G5.
2. Install HTS 5.0-15.  
3. Run CDROM test.  watch it fail.  The CDROM is model 224E_N
  
Actual results:


Expected results: should pass.


Additional info: results rpm and SELinux log are attached.
Comment 1 Gregory Feiner 2007-01-11 15:43:45 UTC 
Created attachment 145360 [details]
CDROM test results.
Comment 2 Gregory Feiner 2007-01-11 15:44:22 UTC 
Created attachment 145361 [details]
SELinux sercurity violation during CDROM test.
Comment 3 Gregory Feiner 2007-01-11 19:53:37 UTC 
Garry Wong has found that changing the SELinux Enforcement to Permissive gets 
past this problem.  However, according to documentation, Enforced is 
required.  Given this, is this workaround valid?
Comment 4 Greg Nichols 2007-01-11 20:54:44 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 218124 ***