Bug 2224031

Summary:	Repository sync failed with error "ERROR: insert or update on table "katello_repository_rpms"
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	mithun kalyat <mkalyat>
Component:	Repositories	Assignee:	Samir Jha <sajha>
Status:	VERIFIED ---	QA Contact:	Cole Higgins <chiggins>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.14.0	CC:	ahumbe, amahindr, amiagarw, chiggins, iballou, rlavi, sajha, vijsingh
Target Milestone:	6.14.0	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description mithun kalyat 2023-07-19 15:52:30 UTC

Description of problem:

I have enabled the following repositories and triggered sync for the first time on all 4 of them simultaneously.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - AppStream RPMs 8

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - BaseOS RPMs 8

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - AppStream Kickstart 8.7

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - BaseOS Kickstart 8.7

Only 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 for x86_64 - BaseOS RPMs 8' sync failed with the following error.

PG::ForeignKeyViolation: ERROR:  insert or update on table "katello_repository_rpms" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_39a260fd51"
DETAIL:  Key (rpm_id)=(5304) is not present in table "katello_rpms".

Res-sync of the above repository fixed the issue. I can't reproduce it for RHEL 9 same set repositories.

Comment 4 Ian Ballou 2023-07-25 20:53:10 UTC

I was able to reproduce it. It's on our board to fix. Adding 6.14.0+.

Comment 5 Ian Ballou 2023-07-25 20:54:57 UTC

I reproduced the issue by syncing 4 RHEL repos (RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 AppStream + BaseOS) at the same time like noted in the BZ description.

Comment 6 Ian Ballou 2023-07-25 20:56:23 UTC

Bumping priority since it's a sync blocker.

Comment 7 Samir Jha 2023-07-26 17:57:17 UTC

Looking at the error and failure in index action when reproducing, the reason the RPM might have been deleted before a RepositoryRPM is created as the error says is because we had a delete_orphan task being invoked in index_action which would delete all content which hadn't been associated to a repository. Looks like a race condition side effect from that.

We have removed delete_orphan from index action in snap 8 as part of this BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221291 so this should be resolved. Currently testing on a second snap 8 instance.

Comment 9 Ron Lavi 2023-07-31 12:25:45 UTC

*** Bug 2224738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Brad Buckingham 2023-08-11 12:02:56 UTC

*** Bug 2226667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***