Bug 2225433
Summary: | Failed to restart VMI in cnv - Failed to terminate process Device or resource busy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Rakshith <rar> |
Component: | csi-driver | Assignee: | Rakshith <rar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vishakha Kathole <vkathole> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.12 | CC: | ableisch, hnallurv, kbg, kramdoss, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, rcyriac, sheggodu, sreber |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | ODF 4.12.8 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.12.8-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Previously, during the reclaimspace operation, I/O and performance was impacted when the `rbd sparsify` command was executed on the RADOS block device (RBD) persistent volume claim (PVC) while it was attached to a pod. With this fix, the execution of the `rbd sparsify` command is skipped when the RBD PVC is found to be attached to a pod during the operation. As a result, any negative impact of running the reclaim space operation on a RBD PVC attached to a pod is mitigated.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-09-27 14:48:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2225420 |
Description
Rakshith
2023-07-25 10:02:51 UTC
steps to reproduce - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214838#c46 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.12.8 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:5377 |