Bug 222618 (llk)

Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: kingyipan <kingyipan>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: chitlesh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-09 13:46:43 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description kingyipan 2007-01-15 05:11:39 EST
Spec URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk_linux-2.2-1lp.src.rpm
Description: 

A popular game.
  To get a sponsor.
Comment 1 kingyipan 2007-01-15 05:17:57 EST
I'm working with rpm.I want to becom a fedora extras contributor.
Comment 2 Chitlesh GOORAH 2007-01-15 05:35:26 EST
hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

Read them and do the appropriate corrections
Comment 3 kingyipan 2007-01-18 20:56:07 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
> 
> Read them and do the appropriate corrections
Thanks for your comment, I'm sorry for my abruptness review request;
I would read the fedora packageing guideline more seriousely,although i had read
them one time befor.
Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-10 09:16:25 EST
Umm??
Comment 5 Nigel Jones 2007-04-27 05:37:25 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> Umm??

I think Mamoru wanted to say that if you would like to see a package in Fedora
it MUST (and I really stress MUST) meet all Package Guidelines, it MUST also be
updated when required to ensure it meets all changes to Package Guidelines.

I suggest you read the links provided in Comment #2 and look at other review
requests to see what is expected.
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-24 11:58:31 EDT
ping again?
Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-31 14:19:58 EDT
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received
from the submitter within ONE WEEK.
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-06-09 13:46:43 EDT
CLOSING.

If someone want to maintain this package, please file 
a new review request, thank you.