Bug 222618 (llk)

Summary:	Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	kingyipan <kingyipan>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	chitlesh
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-06-09 17:46:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description kingyipan 2007-01-15 10:11:39 UTC

Spec URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk_linux-2.2-1lp.src.rpm
Description: 

A popular game.
  To get a sponsor.

Comment 1 kingyipan 2007-01-15 10:17:57 UTC

I'm working with rpm.I want to becom a fedora extras contributor.

Comment 2 Chitlesh GOORAH 2007-01-15 10:35:26 UTC

hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

Read them and do the appropriate corrections

Comment 3 kingyipan 2007-01-19 01:56:07 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
> 
> Read them and do the appropriate corrections
Thanks for your comment, I'm sorry for my abruptness review request;
I would read the fedora packageing guideline more seriousely,although i had read
them one time befor.

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-10 14:16:25 UTC

Umm??

Comment 5 Nigel Jones 2007-04-27 09:37:25 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Umm??

I think Mamoru wanted to say that if you would like to see a package in Fedora
it MUST (and I really stress MUST) meet all Package Guidelines, it MUST also be
updated when required to ensure it meets all changes to Package Guidelines.

I suggest you read the links provided in Comment #2 and look at other review
requests to see what is expected.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-24 15:58:31 UTC

ping again?

Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-31 18:19:58 UTC

I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received
from the submitter within ONE WEEK.

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-06-09 17:46:43 UTC

CLOSING.

If someone want to maintain this package, please file 
a new review request, thank you.