Bug 2227600
Summary: | [EC 8+6 profile on 4 nodes]: crush: choose leaf with type = 0 may incorrectly map out osds | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vidushi Mishra <vimishra> |
Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Samuel Just <sjust> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pawan <pdhiran> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | akraj, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ngangadh, nojha, pdhiran, rpollack, sjust, tserlin, vumrao |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-19.1.1-8.el9cp | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
.New MSR CRUSH rules for erasure encoded pools
Multi-step-retry (MSR) is a new type of CRUSH rule for placing multiple OSDs on each host.
With this enhancement, `crush-osds-per-failure-domain` and `crush-num-failure-domains` can now be specified for erasure-coded (EC) pools during their creation. These pools use newly introduced MSR CRUSH rules to place multiple OSDs within each failure domain. For example, 14 OSDs split across 4 hosts.
For more information, see /architecture/con_core_ceph-erasure-coding
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-11-25 08:59:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2317218 |
Description
Vidushi Mishra
2023-07-31 04:50:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216 |