Bug 2228465

Summary: Please explain if "accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval" should apply to RHEL8.2+ or not [rhel-8.8.0.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: RHEL Program Management Team <pgm-rhel-tools>
Component: scap-security-guideAssignee: Vojtech Polasek <vpolasek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.7CC: acortes, ggasparb, jcerny, jjaburek, matyc, mhaicman, mlysonek, vpolasek, wsato
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: scap-security-guide-0.1.69-1.el8_8 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Faillock settings clarification in STIG profile Mapping of rule accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval has been clarified in the STIG profile. The rule now covers both RHEL-08-020012 and RHEL-08-020013.The reason for this change in that accounts_passwords_pam_faillock_interval checks for `faillock` configuration in both `/etc/pam.d/password-auth`, `/etc/pam.d/system-auth` and `/etc/security/faillock.conf`.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2209073 Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-19 14:35:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2209073    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 7 Ana Cortes Hernandez 2023-09-01 09:02:54 UTC
scap-security-guide-0.1.69-2.el8_8 is in RHEL-8.8.0-updates-20230826.47 compose. Doctext looks good. VERIFIED.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2023-09-19 14:35:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (scap-security-guide bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:5267