Bug 2228785
Summary: | [ODF][OBC] Provisioning of Radosgw OBCs with the same bucket name is successful | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Daniel Dominguez <ddomingu> |
Component: | rook | Assignee: | Jiffin <jthottan> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Uday kurundwade <ukurundw> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.12 | CC: | bniver, ebenahar, jthottan, kbg, mbenjamin, muagarwa, odf-bz-bot, sostapov, tnielsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | ODF 4.15.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.15.0-103 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.Provisioning object bucket claim with the same bucket name
Previously, for the green field use case, creation of two object bucket claims (OBCs) with the same bucket name was successful from the user interface. Even though two OBCs were created, the second one pointed to invalid credentials.
With this fix, creation of the second OBC with the same bucket name is blocked and it is no longer possible to create two OBCs with the same bucket name for green field use case.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-03-19 15:22:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2246375 |
Description
Daniel Dominguez
2023-08-03 09:22:55 UTC
https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/12804 got megred to fix this issue Jiffin, please open a backport PR to the release-4.14 branch. We should have this in now instead of waiting for 4.15. (In reply to Travis Nielsen from comment #5) > Jiffin, please open a backport PR to the release-4.14 branch. We should have > this in now instead of waiting for 4.15. PR https://github.com/red-hat-storage/rook/pull/518 posted Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383 |