Bug 2229209
| Summary: | entries "epo" and "map" in hostname_map section of default_mappings change the "sosreport" file name | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Carlos Santos <casantos> |
| Component: | sos | Assignee: | Pavel Moravec <pmoravec> |
| Status: | CLOSED MIGRATED | QA Contact: | Supportability QE <supportability-qe> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.8 | CC: | agk, jcastillo, jjansky, plambri, sbradley, theute |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | MigratedToJIRA |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-09-06 13:53:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Carlos Santos
2023-08-04 16:02:29 UTC
This is tricky. Sos takes /etc/hosts for hostname mapping. So whatever string is there, it treats it as a sensitive information to obfuscate. So for e.g. "rep" in /etc/hosts, "sosreport" string is obfuscated - including tarball filename (as it usually contains host's shortname). How to behave better? Obfuscate not (sub)strings blindly, but for each string STR to camouflage, find just strings matching [^|\W]STR[$|\W] regular expression? (i.e. start of line or non-alphanumeric character before the STR, and end of line or non-alphanumeric character after the STR)? What about *not* obfuscating "rep01", then? Is it ok? (I feel so..) sos cleaner has a few parsers/mappers, one for hostnames+domainnames, one for IPv4, one for IPv6, one for MAC addresses, usernames and keywords (provided by user via a config). I guess this feature "dont obfuscate substrings, just strings" should be applied only to: - hostnames+domainnames - usernames - keywords As only those are alphanumeric words. Is that improvement sound? (In reply to Pavel Moravec from comment #1) > sos cleaner has a few parsers/mappers, one for hostnames+domainnames, one > for IPv4, one for IPv6, one for MAC addresses, usernames and keywords > (provided by user via a config). I guess this feature "dont obfuscate > substrings, just strings" should be applied only to: > - hostnames+domainnames > - usernames > - keywords > > As only those are alphanumeric words. > > Is that improvement sound? I will ask the customer in the associated support case if that's a satisfying approach. (In reply to Pavel Moravec from comment #1) > sos cleaner has a few parsers/mappers, one for hostnames+domainnames, one > for IPv4, one for IPv6, one for MAC addresses, usernames and keywords > (provided by user via a config). I guess this feature "dont obfuscate > substrings, just strings" should be applied only to: > - hostnames+domainnames > - usernames > - keywords > > As only those are alphanumeric words. > > Is that improvement sound? According to the customer, that seems fine, but mostly concerning are the single and double chars masking. It might lead to unknown issues, like decreased time of cleaning, with wrong masking of insensitive chars. ---> "e": "host22", Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug. This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there. Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated. Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information. To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer. You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like: "Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567 In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. |