Bug 2229847
| Summary: | /v2/_catalog is available despite container support being disabled | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Update Infrastructure for Cloud Providers | Reporter: | Alexey Masolov <amasolov> |
| Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Radek Bíba <rbiba> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.4.0 | CC: | mshimura |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Alexey Masolov
2023-08-08 01:14:44 UTC
In general, RHUA:443 should be configured to be accessible only by the RHUA node itself, and from CDS nodes if RHUI has been installed with "--container-support-enabled True" or "--fetch-missing-symlinks True". No external users/attackers should be able to access the catalog directly on the RHUA. This access should be limited on the firewall / security group level. Because, if RHUA:443 is accessible from the outside, you have a much bigger problem -- the Pulp API is then public, which includes the admin web UI and freely browsable repositories. Only the load balancer should be public facing, and when container support is disabled, https://LB/v2/_catalog will return HTTP 404. I don't think it's a risk if the (empty) catalog is available from the RHUA's localhost interface, but if you have specific concerns about this, please let me know. |