Bug 2229932
Summary: | Problem with requirement of `/usr/libexec/virtiofsd` | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek> |
Component: | kata-containers | Assignee: | Emanuel Lima <emlima> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 38 | CC: | dinechin, elima, emlima, ferdnyc, go-sig, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-11-23 13:58:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2180842 |
Description
Jaroslav Mracek
2023-08-08 08:49:24 UTC
I was under the impression that https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kata-containers/pull-request/4 fully solved the problem. Could you give me the exact steps you did to reproduce the problem? Could you give me more info @jmracek It looks like the F38 branch still has the old spec with the /usr/libexec/ dependency, I wonder if that's what was meant by still reproducible? Does DNF5 need to be supported under F38, or is the fact that F39 and rawhide have been fixed sufficient to consider this solved? AFAIK DNF5 will only be supported starting with F40, so that should not be an issue. The issue is fixed in rawhide, therefore I am satisfied. |