Bug 2231374

Summary:	[DDF] Section 2.5 talks about the crush hierarchy, but does not, at all, mention device-classes, but instead explains
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	ceph-docs <ceph-docs>
Documentation sub component:	DDF	QA Contact:	Manisha Saini <msaini>
Status:	NEW ---	Docs Contact:
Severity:	medium
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	vereddy
Version:	6.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	7.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-08-11 12:50:57 UTC

Section 2.5 talks about the crush hierarchy, but does not, at all, mention device-classes, but instead explains how we pinned pools to specific device collections, in the way we did prior to RHCS-3.

We should emphasise on making use of the device-class notation.

I pointed this out in a different doc, earlier in the year.

It would be appropriate to look through all our RHCS doc's and make this update, across the board.

Reported by: rh-ee-hemoller

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/6/html/object_gateway_guide/considerations-and-recommendations#annotations:5906feef-d4d1-4ced-9bf4-6b72a27058b6

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-08-11 12:51:05 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.