Bug 2232064

Summary:	unset GTK_IM_MODULE and QT_IM_MODULE for Plasma Wayland
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component:	imsettings	Assignee:	Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	39	CC:	i18n-bugs, ngompa13, tagoh, tfujiwar
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	i18n
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	imsettings-1.8.4-1.fc40 imsettings-1.8.4-1.fc39	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2233527 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-08-22 12:19:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2233527

Description Jens Petersen 2023-08-15 06:57:39 UTC

With ibus-1.5.29 in Fedora 29, QT_IM_MODULE and GTK_IM_MODULE should no longer be set for KDE Plasma Wayland.

Can you make such a change to imsettings, please?

Without that the behavior of ibus in Plasma Wayland is really bad.
(This change should not be made for Plasma X11.)

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. env | grep MODULE
Actual Results:  
GTK_IM_MODULE=ibus
QT_IM_MODULE=ibus

Expected Results:  
GTK_IM_MODULE and QT_IM_MODULE to be unset in Plasma Wayland

Related to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.29

Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2023-08-15 07:44:31 UTC

Do we still need it for X11, right?

Comment 2 fujiwara 2023-08-15 08:18:00 UTC

(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #1)
> Do we still need it for X11, right?

Yes, we do.

Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2023-08-17 14:01:21 UTC

One more question. This report requests to unset GTK_IM_MODULE too. does IBus 1.5.29 work without GSettings and GTK_IM_MODULE on Plasma-wayland?

Comment 4 fujiwara 2023-08-18 02:20:19 UTC

(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #3)
> One more question. This report requests to unset GTK_IM_MODULE too. does
> IBus 1.5.29 work without GSettings and GTK_IM_MODULE on Plasma-wayland?

Yes, it does. Those environment variables need to be unset.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2023-08-21 16:04:15 UTC

Seems imsettings-plasma was dropped from @input-methods:

https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/7553747fb0e4c1c6b97935dde1443e27de5fa3da?branch=main
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/98e56a9cf0425b76e9a0e8237113d87ad0b4cafa?branch=main

So we may need to retest but this could this affect Plasma X11 aversely?

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2023-08-21 18:16:21 UTC

The way this gets set needs to be changed then to only activate when a Plasma X11 session is used. It currently does it unconditionally.

Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2023-08-22 02:33:54 UTC

I'm going to update imsettings for this.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-08-22 12:16:41 UTC

FEDORA-2023-adec06104c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-adec06104c

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2023-08-22 12:19:15 UTC

FEDORA-2023-adec06104c has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2023-08-22 12:38:05 UTC

FEDORA-2023-989df31081 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-989df31081

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2023-08-22 12:40:17 UTC

FEDORA-2023-989df31081 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Akira TAGOH 2023-08-22 14:16:07 UTC

Just a note
To get this fixed completely, we need to update ibus.conf too

See #2233527

Comment 13 Jens Petersen 2023-08-24 11:52:00 UTC

Working well so so far, thank you!!