Bug 2232517

CentOS has:  gcc-toolset-12-runtime-12.0-5
RHEL has:    gcc-toolset-12-12.0-6

This matters because the -6 release has support for the gcc generated version of the annobin plugin.  cf:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216918#c25

Doh - please ignore the "runtime" in the comparison above.  The "runtime" is rpm is just part of the meta package.

Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate branches.

Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?

(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate
> branches.
> 
> Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?

I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well.

The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and needs to work on all of them.  So this probably going to be a y-stream fix for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases.  Although since we are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others.

(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> > Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate
> > branches.
> > 
> > Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?
> 
> I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well.

I suppose I'm going to have to ask for all these branches to be created...

> The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and
> needs to work on all of them.  So this probably going to be a y-stream fix
> for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases.  Although since we
> are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a
> y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others.

...and depending on how fast they are created, the y-stream will be determined.

Actually, I don't think we need z-streams for CentOS, just a y-stream branch.

Created https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1710

But the branches also don't exist in RHEL so I guess I'll need *another* ticket.

(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #8)
> But the branches also don't exist in RHEL so I guess I'll need *another*
> ticket.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELBLD-13581

Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.