Bug 2232517
| Summary: | The RHEL version of the gcc-toolset-12 metapackage is newer than the CentOS version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Reporter: | Nick Clifton <nickc> |
| Component: | gcc-toolset-12 | Assignee: | Marek Polacek <mpolacek> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | CentOS Stream | CC: | bstinson, jwboyer |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Bugfix, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nick Clifton
2023-08-17 08:33:11 UTC
CentOS has: gcc-toolset-12-runtime-12.0-5 RHEL has: gcc-toolset-12-12.0-6 This matters because the -6 release has support for the gcc generated version of the annobin plugin. cf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216918#c25 Doh - please ignore the "runtime" in the comparison above. The "runtime" is rpm is just part of the meta package. Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate branches. Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9? (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate > branches. > > Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9? I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well. The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and needs to work on all of them. So this probably going to be a y-stream fix for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases. Although since we are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others. (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > > Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate > > branches. > > > > Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9? > > I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well. I suppose I'm going to have to ask for all these branches to be created... > The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and > needs to work on all of them. So this probably going to be a y-stream fix > for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases. Although since we > are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a > y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others. ...and depending on how fast they are created, the y-stream will be determined. Actually, I don't think we need z-streams for CentOS, just a y-stream branch. But the branches also don't exist in RHEL so I guess I'll need *another* ticket. |