Bug 2241996

Summary: Review Request: golang-fortio-testscript - Testscript only fork of rogpeppe/go-internal
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Pavel Solovev <daron439>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mikel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: ppisar: fedora-review?
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1998778    

Comment 1 Pavel Solovev 2023-10-03 19:01:56 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107026713

Comment 2 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-03-06 20:18:59 UTC
Is `testscript` binary required? if so, you'll need to change the name during %build and patch `folio`, as package golang-github-rogpeppe-internal already provides it:

> # dnf whatprovides /usr/bin/testscript
> Last metadata expiration check: 3:57:53 ago on Wed Mar  6 17:20:35 2024.
> golang-github-rogpeppe-internal-1.8.1-6.fc39.x86_64 : Selected Go-internal packages factored out from the standard library
> Repo        : fedora
> Matched from:
> Filename    : /usr/bin/testscript

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-10-24 00:45:34 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2025-11-05 11:50:44 UTC
This should follow new Go package guidelines around vendoring.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:36:54 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:38:58 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9819662
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2241996-golang-fortio-testscript/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09819662-golang-fortio-testscript/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.