Bug 2244510

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-faraday1 - HTTP/REST API client library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Benson Muite 2023-10-16 16:21:16 UTC

spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/rubygem-faraday1/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06530498-rubygem-faraday1/rubygem-faraday1.spec
srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/rubygem-faraday1/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06530498-rubygem-faraday1/rubygem-faraday1-1.0.1-11.fc40.src.rpm

description:
HTTP/REST API client library.

fas: fed500

koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107600111

Comment:
This is a renaming request to allow the package rubygem-faraday to be upgraded
to the latest release version 2.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2023-10-17 12:35:24 UTC

The `Obsoletes:  rubygem-faraday < 1.0.1-10` should probably be either `<=` or `< 1.0.1-11`.

But in any case, are the Provides/Obsoletes actually needed? In current situation, rubygem-faraday and rubygem-faradary1 are the same. In the future, keep using rubygem-faraday (i.e. Faraday 2) is the preferred situation. If rubygem-faraday1 is needed for some purpose, then it should be pulled in via dependencies such as: `Requires: rubygem(faraday) < 2`. Or am I missing something?

Comment 2 Package Review 2024-10-17 00:45:25 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Benson Muite 2024-11-08 17:24:09 UTC

Will update.