Bug 2248841
Summary: | Conflicts of pcp rpms for i686 and x86_64 architectures | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Kurik <jkurik> |
Component: | pcp | Assignee: | Nathan Scott <nathans> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 40 | CC: | agerstmayr, jkurik, lchilton, mgoodwin, nathans, sfeifer |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-03-19 22:44:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 179258, 2254956 |
Description
Jan Kurik
2023-11-09 09:06:35 UTC
I did a check for packages dependent on i686 versions of pcp and I have not find any: # yum repoquery --whatrequires pcp-conf.i686 --recursive # yum repoquery --whatrequires pcp.i686 --recursive Those two commands above show just sub-packages of pcp.srpm To be solved by https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp/pull/1843 I'd like to point out that your queries were not sufficient because they did not account for all subpackages of pcp, namely the `*-devel` package. Subsequently, you have broken the build of sysstat on i386. If you want to stop building pcp for i386, I strongly suggest you to fix all the remaining packages (if any) that still depend on pcp before dropping support for some architecture in the future: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110491403 (In reply to Lukáš Zaoral from comment #3) > I'd like to point out that your queries were not sufficient because they did > not account for all subpackages of pcp, namely the `*-devel` package. > Subsequently, you have broken the build of sysstat on i386. If you want to > stop building pcp for i386, I strongly suggest you to fix all the remaining > packages (if any) that still depend on pcp before dropping support for some > architecture in the future: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110491403 I am sorry for the trouble and thanks for the remedy as discussed on a side channel. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 40 development cycle. Changing version to 40. Jan's fix mentioned in #c2 was released in pcp-6.2.0 available on all Fedora versions now. |