Bug 2249249
| Summary: | Review Request: paraver - Expressive powerful and flexible trace visualizer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Benson Muite <benson_muite> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dave Love <dave.love> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dave.love, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | xavier:
fedora-review?
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://tools.bsc.es/paraver | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Benson Muite
2023-11-11 16:29:01 UTC
I should take this as I've already packaged it, but I won't get to it immediately. (I've also done the other BSC tools.) Thanks. Apologies for not getting to this earlier. I haven't looked at it in detail yet but, first of all, it doesn't run as built: $ wxparaver /usr/bin/wxparaver.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libparaver-api.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Would you maintain it for EPEL (where it doesn't currently build)? EL is clearly a lot more relevant for HPC than Fedora. Will you fix the runtime failure? Checking this. Can add EPEL later, but not immediate priority. [fedora-review-service-build] Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6985694 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2249249-paraver/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06985694-paraver/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. Benson, Are you still interested in this? I'd forgotten about it and don't seem to have had a working package. It will need updating to the current release now. |