Bug 2251821

Summary:	Please branch and build corosync-qdevice in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	corosync-qdevice	Assignee:	Jan Friesse <jfriesse>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	40	CC:	jfriesse, pasik
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-03-31 08:52:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2251820

Description Davide Cavalca 2023-11-27 21:48:28 UTC

Please branch and build corosync-qdevice in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain corosync-qdevice in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/corosync-qdevice/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2023-11-27 21:49:02 UTC

Note: this is part of the High Availability add-on in RHEL, so it's eligible for EPEL per the policy.

Comment 2 Aoife Moloney 2024-02-15 23:05:56 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 40 development cycle.
Changing version to 40.

Comment 3 Jan Friesse 2025-03-31 08:52:27 UTC

Totally overlook this one, sorry :( Anyway, I don't really see too much reason(s) to include corosync-qdevice in epel. I could (somehow) understood corosync package because dependency of asterisk. But qdevice is really not needed.

Another problem is I had to take maintainership of libqb-epel + kronosnet-epel and update them to make corosync at buildable - and I'm pretty sure same would happen with corosync-qdevice.

I don't think idea is to provide every single package from HA-addon to epel.

So closing this as wontfix, but please don't hesitate to reopen it if you have really good argument to include qdevice into epel.