Bug 2251884
| Summary: | Set -fstack-protector-strong for improved security. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | pmquinn5 |
| Component: | chromium | Assignee: | Than Ngo <than> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 39 | CC: | spotrh, than, tpopela, yaneti |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | chromium-120.0.6099.62-1.fc39 chromium-120.0.6099.62-2.fc38 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-12-08 01:39:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
pmquinn5
2023-11-28 08:55:04 UTC
(In reply to pmquinn5 from comment #0) > Based on the following quote from this upstream thread > https://crbug.com/533294: > > > We do want -fstack-protector-strong enabled. Chrome OS has been using it for years, and it does provide real-world mitigations. Android will be globally using it soon (there is active work on removing the last few problems there). > > And the following patch from GrapheneOS's Vanadium: > > https://github.com/GrapheneOS/Vanadium/blob/main/patches/0003-switch-to- > fstack-protector-strong.patch > > Including the above patch would provide proactive security improvement over > the existing -fstack-protector setting. > > The reason this was not done upstream looks to be because of this: > > > The size difference for a stripped Chromium branded chrome binary is 107700176 -> 110489552. 2.7 MB / 2.6% increase. > > This seems insignificant relative to the security benefit. > i agree with you. The next chromium will be built with this compiler flag. Thanks! FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8 FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643 FEDORA-2023-5d1b8507b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2023-a32ad3e643 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |